October 25, 2016
        Mel Gibson to be Honored with the Hollywood Director Award at the 20th Annual Hollywood Film Awards                Michael Moore drops a surprise new film with "Michael Moore in TrumpLand"                Hollywood Contenders: New Oscar Predictions for October                Nicole Kidman, Hugh Grant, Naomie Harris, Lily Collins get Honors at 20th Annual Hollywood Film Awards                "Manchester by the Sea" leads the Gotham Award nominations                Tom Ford, Marc Platt and Kenneth Lonergan to be Honored at 20th Annual Hollywood Film Awards                Tom Cruise is in his action hero comfort zone with "Jack Reacher: Never Go Back"                "Moonlight" could be A24's big Oscar horse this year                Ewan McGregor steps behind the camera with "American Pastoral"                Hollywood Contenders: A second crack at Golden Globe predictions for 2016                "The Accountant" seeks to help give Ben Affleck another blockbuster                85 countries will be competing for Best Foreign Language Feature nominations at the Oscars                Tom Hanks to receive Hollywood Actor Award for "Sully" @ Hollywood Film Awards                "Certain Women" showcases Laura Dern, Kristen Stewart, and Michelle Williams                Ben Affleck is perhaps Hollywood's biggest and most diverse superstar        

Hollywood Movie Roundup: Will anyone remember these “Titans”?


If you measure Summer by big budget, effects-driven movies, then Summer has arrived. We have a Greek mythology remake that fits the bill and some counter-programming in the form of Hannah Montana-meets-Nicholas Sparks and a semi-annual offering from Tyler Perry. If you’re looking for something with good reviews, on the other hand, you’re best advised to stick with the art house.


Sam Worthington, hot off “Avatar,” stars as the demigod Perseus, stepping into the  familial squabbling involving Zeus (Liam Neeson) and Hades (Ralph Fiennes). Louis Leterrier (“Transporter 2,” “The Incredible Hulk” reboot) directs from a script credited to Phil Hay & Matt Manfredi and Travis Beacham, based on the 1981 movie that starred Harry Hamlin and Laurence Olivier and developed a cult following over the years.

Even critics who find the movie moderately entertaining don’t agree on the visual appeal. Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times saw it in 2D and thought it looked “terrific,” cautioning families to save the extra money it costs now to see it in 3D. Owen Glieberman of Entertainment Weekly declares that “there isn’t a single good ‘Wow!’ of a 3D shot in the entire picture.” The majority of the reviewers were much less accommodating. Manohla Dargis of the New York Times writes that it matches the 1981 version as “goofily amusing” — but that’s not actually a compliment. The USA Today’s Claudia Puig labels it a “boring behemoth,” Rolling Stone’s Peter Travers calls it a “sham” and the Wall Street Journal’s Joe Morgenstern says it is a “sad fiasco.” Dana Stevens of Slate suggests that Leterrier and company should have “steered straight into camp and stepped on the gas.”

Postponed a week so that it could be converted to 3D, “Titans” marches into spring break with a big action-movie push from Warner Bros. Sold as “300” with monsters, it should break $60 million for its first weekend — with WB hoping for something approaching the 2007 film’s $70.9M opening. With 3D quickly becoming the standard for big movies, it will be interesting to see if audiences discern between those actually shot in 3D (such as “Avatar”) and these so-called “conversions.”


The mega-selling novelist Sparks adds screenwriter to his resume (sharing credit with Jeff Van Wie) with this adaptation of his novel. Miley Cyrus gets her first non-Hannah live-action lead playing a teen who is sent off to spend some quality time with her estranged father (the recently omnipresent Greg Kinnear). Australian heartthrob Liam Hemsworth and Kelly Preston also star. TV director Julie Anne Robinson (“Weeds,” “Grey’s Anatomy”) makes her feature debut.

The reviews are all over the middle-ground with nobody really loving it and nobody really hating it. Okay, the NY Post’s Lou Lumenick and Travers really hate it, but otherwise things are pretty lukewarm to tepid. The boosters, EW’s Lisa Schwarzbaum and Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times, primarily praise Cyrus as a budding movie star. At the other end, A.O. Scott, in the NYT, writes that it is “as stuffed with bogus feeling and overwrought incident as a fast-food burrito.” Maudlin seems to be a very popular word reviewers are using to describe the movie.

“Song” got an early jump on the competition with a Wednesday opening, leapfrogging “How to Train Your Dragon” on the daily box-office chart. It doesn’t figure to give “Titans” much of a run for the money, but Sparks’ adaptations are generally solid performers. “Dear John” opened at $30.5 million earlier this year and went on to do $89 million. The presence of Cyrus would figure to lure younger audiences — “Hannah Montana the Movie” did $32.3M this time last year — but forecasters are betting this one does around $16M for the weekend and $22M for the five days.


The prolific hyphenate reconvenes the four couples from his 2007 drama, “Tyler Perry’s Why Did I Get Married?” in the Bahamas for further meditations on relationships. Perry, Sharon Leal, Janet Jackson, Malik Yoba, Jill Scott, Lamman Rucker, Richard T. Jones, and Tasha Smith play the tight-knit group of buppies struggling to maintain life’s balance.

Despite Lionsgate’s declarations to the contrary, they still don’t trust critics enough to screen Perry’s films in advance. Most of his early movies, which were largely adaptations of plays featuring the over-the-top Madea character, were greeted harshly by reviewers. However, his attempt at more mainstream fare — the first “Why Did I Get Married” — fared slightly better with critics. Jeannette Catsoulis, writing in the NYT, called “WDIGM,” “a beautifully shot (by Toyomichi Kurita), fluid drama filled with compassionately written characters.”

Perry’s films is as dependable as they come at the box office and this one figures to be no different. It should easily clear $20M and factoring in the Easter holiday, “Why Did I Get Married Too?” could finish closer to $30M and eclipse “Last Song.”




About Kevin Crust

KEVIN CRUST is a Southern California-based writer and editor of the Eclectic Odeon Review, an online guide to seeing movies in Los Angeles, launching in March 2010. In 18 years at the Los Angeles Times, he worked as a copy editor, senior researcher and staff writer. For most of the past decade, he was a key part of the Times' award-winning film department, coordinating the Calendar section's popular Sneaks issues, writing columns on alternative cinema and DVDs, and reviewing hundreds of movies. His work has also appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle.

Follow us

Breaking Hollywood News   


One Comment

  • April 2, 2010 | Permalink |

    I doubt most people will notice a difference between the 3d in Avatar and Clash. I saw so many news articles and comments from people about how bad the 3d conversion in Alice in Wonderland was. Then someone took me to see Alice in 3d. The first part of the movie before Alice went to wonderland I thought how right they were, the movie didn’t seem to be in 3d at all, it seemed so 2d. Then when she went through the door into wonderland the 3d became so apparent. Then I realized it was a kind of a Wizard of Oz thing with the black and white and changing to color. From then on the 3d looked great and I thought it looked just about as good as Avatar in 3d. I walked out of that movie kind frustrated because either all those people didn’t see Alice in wonderland and just lied about how bad the conversion was, or they hate 3d some much they would have see it as bad no matter how good the 3d was done. My conclusion, most people won’t know these movies are converted, and won’t notice a difference. Only the small group of the giant movie buffs who read every magazine and new article on movies will know to look for a difference, the rest of us will think it looks fine because the difference is so small.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.