"Get Out" leads the Gotham Award nominations                'Blade Runner 2049,' 'The Disaster Artist' to be Honored at Hollywood Film Awards                Hollywood Contenders – Looking at Best Original Screenplay hopefuls                Todd Haynes explores the world of children with "Wonderstruck"                MUDBOUND and COCO to be Honored at Hollywood Film Awards                "The Killing of a Sacred Deer" pairs Colin Farrell and Nicole Kidman once again                "Wonder Wheel" closes NYFF with a commanding Kate Winslet turn                Sam Rockwell and Allison Janney to Receive Hollywood Supporting Actor and Hollywood Supporting Actress Awards at "Hollywood Film Awards"                Hollywood Contenders – Looking at Best Adapted Screenplay hopefuls                "Breathe" aims to return Andrew Garfield to Oscar contention                Mary J. Blige, Timothée Chalamet and the Cast of "I, Tonya" - Margot Robbie, Allison Janney, Sebastian Stan, Paul Walter Hauser to be honored at the 21st Annual "Hollywood Film Awards."                New Trailer drops for "Star Wars: The Last Jedi"                "Goodbye Christopher Robin" reveals the origins of Winnie the Pooh                Hollywood Contenders – Looking at Best Supporting Actress hopefuls                "The Florida Project" is one of the year's best films        

Don’t blame the stars, blame the studios? Are young, rising stars risking their careers by making vehicles with underperforming studios?

By Scott Mendelson

hollywoodnews.com: We all know that Heigl and Kutcher are going to get ripped in the media because Killers ‘only’ opened with $16 million. And there are those that believe that Letters to Juliet surely could have pulled in $60 million, and that the failure to do so was a sign of Amanda Seyfried’s lacking starpower.

Yet both of those films are perfect examples of the weaknesses inherent in the studios that released them. Letters to Juliet and Killers had no chance to opening to $20 million+, because (for whatever reason) the studios that released them don’t generally open films at that level of business.

If you take away the fluke of Fahrenheit 9/11 and the Tyler Perry pictures, Lionsgate has had three $20 million+ openings in their history (Haunting in Connecticut, The Forbidden Kingdom, and My Bloody Valentine 3D). Same thing with Summit. Take away the Twilight franchise, and they’d have one $20 million+ opener (Knowing) and nothing else above $14 million in the last three or four years.

I would argue that the fact that something as poorly marketed and off-putting as Killers opened to $16 million is very much a testament to the star power of Kutcher and Heigl, and that Seyfried is a star because Letters to Juliet made any money at all, let alone over $43 million thus far (and I’d argue that in a film industry where movies could hold onto screens longer, Letters to Juliet would have made more).

But that’s not the way most entertainment media reads the tea leaves. So, I guess the question is, should Amanda Seyfried have had the foresight to choose a different studio, if possible, to launch what could have been viewed as her breakout movie?

To read more go to MENDELSON’S MEMOS

About HollywoodNews.com

Doing our best to bring you "The Pulse of New Hollywood®." Follow us @hollywoodnews

Follow us

Breaking Hollywood News   


One Comment

  • June 10, 2010 | Permalink |

    (sorry for my English)
    I agree, both films had decent potential but their studios hurt their chances. I mean you can say Killers was panned by critics and is a bad movie and that’s why the OW was underwhelming, but then again….The Ugly Truth was equally panned by critics and it still made more than 200M worldwide AND opened really well stateside.
    And Letters to Juliet still performs well, it will pass 50M and that’s great for Amanda Seyfried considering the budget and the fact a lot of actresses couldn’t get past 40M when they were left alone to deliver a hit (Jennifer Aniston – Love happens, Amy Adams – Leap Year, Jennifer Lopez – The Back-up Plan, Sarah Jessica Parker – Did you hear about the Morgans?, Kristen Stewart – Adventureland, The Runaways).
    So basically at this moment Amanda Seyfried’s sole star power is bigger than any of those actresses” because when they are in a hit they either have very strong BO-co-stars (Aniston, Adams) and/or very strong source material with huge following (Parker, Stewart).

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.