October 23, 2016
        Hollywood Contenders: New Oscar Predictions for October                Nicole Kidman, Hugh Grant, Naomie Harris, Lily Collins get Honors at 20th Annual Hollywood Film Awards                "Manchester by the Sea" leads the Gotham Award nominations                Tom Ford, Marc Platt and Kenneth Lonergan to be Honored at 20th Annual Hollywood Film Awards                Tom Cruise is in his action hero comfort zone with "Jack Reacher: Never Go Back"                "Moonlight" could be A24's big Oscar horse this year                Ewan McGregor steps behind the camera with "American Pastoral"                Hollywood Contenders: A second crack at Golden Globe predictions for 2016                "The Accountant" seeks to help give Ben Affleck another blockbuster                85 countries will be competing for Best Foreign Language Feature nominations at the Oscars                Tom Hanks to receive Hollywood Actor Award for "Sully" @ Hollywood Film Awards                "Certain Women" showcases Laura Dern, Kristen Stewart, and Michelle Williams                Ben Affleck is perhaps Hollywood's biggest and most diverse superstar                "The Birth of a Nation" looks to survive controversy and contend for awards                "The Girl on the Train" hopes to transport Emily Blunt to the Oscar race        

Why family films are better than the adult movies at the moment

By Scott Mendelson

HollywoodNews.com: Here’s a novel idea: “Toy Story 3” is making bank because it’s the best big-studio movie of the year and audiences have already noticed. Steven Zeitchik of the “LA Times” is wrong. Audiences are not flocking to family films because of some rebellion against adult pictures. Audiences are flocking to family pictures because the kids-flicks are better than the adult movies at the moment. Audiences want good films, period. Sure, critics and audiences may disagree on what is ‘good’, and lousy all-ages pictures like “Alice in Wonderland” or teen-centric movies like “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” may be massive hits despite their lack of quality. But at the end of the day, if studios make a good movie and can open the picture through marketing, audiences will usually respond. “The Hangover” didn’t gross six times its opening weekend because it tapped into some kind of zeitgeist. It grossed $277 million off a $44 million opening weekend because it was good. “How to Train Your Dragon” didn’t slowly pull in $215 million from a $43 million opening weekend because audiences suddenly remembered that they had kids. It stuck around because it was a terrific movie, and those that initially saw it fought like hell to make sure their friends and family saw it too.

“The Karate Kid” was unique amongst the summer fare in that it was arguably the lone big summer movies that based its marketing campaign on the idea that it was a good movie. The marketing did not base its campaign on the fact that is a sequel to a movie you liked two years ago (“Iron Man 2”), or a film you had an obligation to see if you were a female (“Sex and the City 2”), or a desperate knock-off of a movie you loved ten years ago (“Robin Hood”), or a dumbed-down version of a 25-year old TV show that was pretty dumb to begin with (“The A-Team”), or something that vaguely resembled action/fantasy franchises that you really liked over the last decade (“Prince of Persia”). Sony sold the character work of Jaden Smith and Jackie Chan and the inherent drama in the story that was being told and got audiences, young and old, into the theater based on the promise of quality. Of all the big summer movies thus far, Sony’s “The Karate Kid” campaign was the only one that had faith in the quality of the film they were selling. And since “The Karate Kid” was actually an emotionally compelling and engaging movie, audiences are responding accordingly (“Toy Story 3” came with the Pixar badge of quality, so they didn’t have to push too hard).

And, for the record, the article in question discusses the relative failures of “The Bounty Hunter” and “Kick-Ass.” Well, let’s compare it to the break-out family film that opened on the same weekend as “The Bounty Hunter.” Yes, “Diary of a Wimpy Kid” cost $15 million while the Aniston/Butler caper cost $40 million, but “The Bounty Hunter” actually made $3 million more in domestic grosses and $71 million more worldwide. And “Kick-Ass” did not disappoint anyone who had any real knowledge of the industry. The film was made for a cult audience, and it is that cult audience that showed up. In the end, the Lionsgate picture made $95 million worldwide on a $50 million acquisition and marketing budget. When you factor in the countless nerds who will buy the DVD or Blu Ray, Carl Icahn won’t have too much to complain about (“Killers” is a problem, but only because the glorified B-movie cost an absurd $70 million).

Awards News, Breaking News, Entertainment News, Movie News, Music News, Hollywood News

To read more go to Mendelson’s Memos.

About Scott Mendelson

Mendelson's Memos: The basics - 30 years old, married with one child, currently residing in Woodland Hills, CA. I am simply a longtime film critic and pundit of sorts, especially in the realm of box office. The main content will be film reviews, trailer reviews, essays, and box office analysis and comparison. I also syndicate myself at The Huffington Post and Open Salon. I will update as often as my schedule allows. Yes, I'm on Facebook/Twitter/LinkIn, so feel free to find me there. All comments are appreciated, just be civil and try to keep a level discourse, as I will make every effort to do the same. Read more at Mendelson's Memos:

Follow us

Breaking Hollywood News   


One Comment

  • July 5, 2010 | Permalink |

    At last a critic who deals with facts and not wishful thinking. Great article and realistically perceptive (how’s that for a compliment?). Look forward to reading more of your analysis of films and the film business. Thanks!

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.