"Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri": October Oscar predictions                "Get Out" leads the Gotham Award nominations                'Blade Runner 2049,' 'The Disaster Artist' to be Honored at Hollywood Film Awards                Hollywood Contenders – Looking at Best Original Screenplay hopefuls                Todd Haynes explores the world of children with "Wonderstruck"                MUDBOUND and COCO to be Honored at Hollywood Film Awards                "The Killing of a Sacred Deer" pairs Colin Farrell and Nicole Kidman once again                "Wonder Wheel" closes NYFF with a commanding Kate Winslet turn                Sam Rockwell and Allison Janney to Receive Hollywood Supporting Actor and Hollywood Supporting Actress Awards at "Hollywood Film Awards"                Hollywood Contenders – Looking at Best Adapted Screenplay hopefuls                "Breathe" aims to return Andrew Garfield to Oscar contention                Mary J. Blige, Timothée Chalamet and the Cast of "I, Tonya" - Margot Robbie, Allison Janney, Sebastian Stan, Paul Walter Hauser to be honored at the 21st Annual "Hollywood Film Awards."                New Trailer drops for "Star Wars: The Last Jedi"                "Goodbye Christopher Robin" reveals the origins of Winnie the Pooh                Hollywood Contenders – Looking at Best Supporting Actress hopefuls        

Awards Season Roundup: “Secretariat” triggers critic slap fight

By Sean O’Connell
Hollywoodnews.com: HollywoodNews.com’s Awards Season Roundup collects insights from around the Internet on films that are running in the Oscar race.

“Secretariat,” which opens today, has sparked a debate between prominent movie critics. The other day, Andrew O’Hehir wrote on Salon that the horse biopic, which he loved, is “a work of creepy, half-hilarious master-race propaganda almost worthy of Leni Riefenstahl, and all the more effective because it presents as a family-friendly yarn about a nice lady and her horse.”

Roger Ebert disagrees, and was compelled to call O’Hehir out in print, writing, “He has nevertheless written a review of ‘Secretariat’ so bizarre I cannot allow it to pass unnoticed.” Ebert dissects O’Hehir’s review point by point, concluding with, “I have no theories about why it was written. No cautionary warnings to issue. My faith in Andrew O’Hehir remains — generally speaking. I am sure he will strive to do better. I myself have written insane reviews. It happens.”

And, of course, O’Hehir responds to the response!

Critic fights are the best. They’re even better (read: more petty) when they occur on Twitter. As for “Secretariat,” I don’t believe the film deserves the time it takes to argue about its intentions. I actually take more offense with Ebert for reviewing – and four-starring! – a movie that’s based on a book written by his close friend, Bill Mack. Ebert goes so far as to say in his review that his relationship with Mack is “not a conflict of interest in writing this review, but more of a declaration.” Wrong. It’s a conflict of interest. But that’s a debate for another day.

Elsewhere, Michelle Williams and Ryan Gosling’s relationship drama “Blue Valentine” just got an NC-17 rating. Will Harvey Weinstein fight the MPAA over this one, too?

Peter Weir’sThe Way Back” has a new trailer (via In Contention).

And Danny Boyle’s127 Hours” has a longer trailer.

A good Q-and-A with “Let Me In” director Matt Reeves.

Gregg Kilday wonders if Paramount is waiting too long to release potential Oscar contenders “True Grit” and “The Fighter.”

And Vanity Fair writes an open letter to the Academy asking for Eli Wallach – who’s already getting an honorary Oscar this year — to be nominated for “Wall Street 2.”

Follow Hollywood News on Twitter for up-to-date news information.

Hollywood News, Hollywood Awards, Awards, Movies, News, Award News, Breaking News, Entertainment News, Movie News, Music News,

About HollywoodNews.com

Doing our best to bring you "The Pulse of New Hollywood®." Follow us @hollywoodnews

Follow us

Breaking Hollywood News   



  • October 8, 2010 | Permalink |

    Hilarious. “Petty” doesn’t even begin to define how meaningless most critics’ debates are… when shared with the general public. Good points made though fellas, so why don’t you take it to email? Otherwise it’s a little self-centered.

  • October 8, 2010 | Permalink |

    Had Ebert reviewed Nack’s book, your accusation of conflict of interest would have merit. Instead, he reviewed a movie based on that book, created by a different set of artists (director, actors, etc). If you can’t realize that a book and a movie are two different things, perhaps you ought to interview Alan Moore (the writer of the graphic novels Watchmen and From Hell) and learn something.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.