"What They Had" finds welcome humor in a tragic setting                Glenn Close, Hugh Jackman and Director Damien Chazelle to Receive Hollywood Film Awards                Ben Foster continues a hot streak with “Galveston”                Paul Dano and Zoe Kazan have captured brilliance with "Wildlife"                Amandla Stenberg, John David Washington, Yalitza Aparicio, Felix Van Groeningen & Crazy Rich Asians To Receive Hollywood Film Awards                David Gordon Green puts his stamp on "Halloween" and crafts a terrific sequel                "Can You Ever Forgive Me?" deliciously pairs Richard E. Grant with Melissa McCarthy                "22 July" sees Paul Greengrass effectively depict another tragic historical event                Timothée Chalamet and Rachel Weisz to be Honored at Hollywood Film Awards                Steve Carell and Timothée Chalamet are gunning for awards with "Beautiful Boy"                "Bad Times At The El Royale" is overstuffed yet pulpy fun from Drew Goddard                87 films will contend for Best Foreign Language Feature this year                "First Man" is another stunning achievement for Damien Chazelle and Ryan Gosling                Updated Academy Award predictions for early October                Bradley Cooper makes a stunning directorial debut with the Oscar frontrunner "A Star Is Born"        

3 things that make “The Voice” more interesting than “American Idol”

By Kim Palacios

hollywoodnews.com: Let’s face it—the “American Idol” format is a little played out. Singers perform. Narcissistic judges give inconsistent (if not biased) feedback. America votes. (Wash. Rinse. Repeat.) If you need proof that the format is failing, note the revolving door of judges, which holds the show’s ratings hostage to new judges’ ability to entertain.

Enter “The Voice”. It’s a show with a format so intriguing that it doesn’t need outlandish celebs to keep audiences interested. Here are three things that make it more interesting than “American Idol”:

Coaches, not judges. Does it sometimes seem that the “American Idol” judges’ only function is to create suspense and supply arbitrary critique? On “The Voice”, the celebs’ role is far more defined—instead of disappearing all week and showing up on performance night only to judge, celebs spend all week personally working with performers.

The coaches are competing, too. The show’s draft-style format finds coaches hand-picking talent to populate each of their teams. Like “American Idol”, “The Voice” culminates in America voting, but the four finalists will have been whittled down from an original thirty-two, with each of the final four from one of the coach’s teams. As coaches pick their talent, they must also be thinking about their own ability to turn their picks into singers who can win the competition. They’ll be looking to prove their chops as producers.

The coaches had to blindly pick their talent. If video killed the radio star, “The Voice” aims to bring real talent back to life. In an era when record deals are granted based as much on good looks and “star power” as they are for talent, “The Voice” outperforms “American Idol” through its design to favor the latter. If the volume of hot girls with mediocre voices who made it through on “American Idol” irked you, you’ll probably appreciate “The Voice”, where looks don’t matter—at least in the audition round.

Follow Hollywood News on Twitter for up-to-date news information.

Hollywood News, Hollywood Awards, Awards, Movies, News, Award News, Breaking News, Entertainment News, Movie News, Music News

About HollywoodNews.com

Doing our best to bring you "The Pulse of New Hollywood®." Follow us @hollywoodnews

Follow us

Breaking Hollywood News   


Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.