Producers Guild Award Goes To "Green Book"                “A Quiet Place” – Emily Blunt and John Krasinski: Hollywood Film Tribute                "Fyre: The Greatest Party That Never Happened" Is A Fascinating Documentary About A Fascinating Disaster                Final Academy Award Predictions Before The Nominees Are Announced                "The Standoff At Sparrow Creek" Is A Claustrophobic And Compelling Mystery                Less Than Acceptable Pacing Dooms "An Acceptable Loss"                “Ben Is Back” – Lucas Hedges, Peter Hedges, and Julia Roberts: Hollywood Film Tribute                "All These Small Moments" Contains A Big Supporting Turn From Harley Quinn Smith                Trailer for "Spider-Man: Far From Home" Sends Peter Parker On An International Adventure!                M. Night Shyamalan Can't Find The Clarity In "Glass"                "Adult Life Skills" Is A Charmingly Quirky Comedy                Oscar Ballots Are Due: Which Films Are Most Likely To Lead The Academy Award Nominations This Year?                Do the Golden Globes and the Oscars act like mobsters?                Critics Choice Awards Go To Christian Bale, Lady Gaga, "Roma", and More!                Box Office Report for January 11-13        

Sony to stop paying for 3D glasses in theaters


By Sean O’Connell
Hollywoodnews.com: Could this be the beginning of the end of the recent 3D craze?

There’s no denying that 3D has helped studios beef up their profits as audience members pay extra at the ticket window to see enhanced versions of select films. But a move by a major studio could derail the gravy train and force patrons to rethink how much they’ll pay for a 3D movie experience.

Sony Pictures confirmed that they will stop paying for the 3D disposable glasses used in theaters starting in May 2012. Of course, the studio has “The Amazing Spider-Man” coming to 3D theaters next July, so this is a bold statement, to say the least.

You might not have known this, but the studios eat the cost of the glasses, and it could cost up to $10 million additional per film (at a price of $.50 per pair of glasses).

The studio, according to EW.com, is “reportedly in favor of an ownership model that would force audiences to purchase the glasses — a system that is already common in Europe and Australia.” This, in theory, would cut down on the need to recycle glasses, so long as people bought one pair for a fixed price and held on to their glasses.

“If you already have your own pair from the last time you went to the movies, then you don’t have to spend that extra [price],” says Rick Heineman of RealD. “Or, in many cases, people are buying their own pairs of premium eyewear, whether it’s from Oakley, Polaroid, or Prada.”

What do you think? Would you buy one pair and hold on to them? Would you mind if 3D tickets increased even more to cover the costs? Will this change the process much, or is it yet another cost-increase in our rapidly changing economy that moviegoers will simply have to absorb? Let us know what you think below.

Hollywood News on Twitter for up-to-date news information.

Hollywood News, Hollywood Awards, Awards, Movies, News, Award News, Breaking News, Entertainment News, Movie News, Music News

About HollywoodNews.com

Doing our best to bring you "The Pulse of New Hollywood®." Follow us @hollywoodnews

Follow us

Breaking Hollywood News   


UPDATES BY EMAIL

One Comment

  • September 28, 2011 | Permalink |

    This is an awesome idea . . . if the 3D glasses are sold separately from the tickets. If I had to buy glasses once and then paid the same for a 2D vs 3D movie. I would start going to 3D movies. I refuse to pay the extra money just for the damn glasses.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.